Friday, January 24, 2014

How will self-driving cars impact the insurance industry?

Self-driving cars have been a hot topic lately in the property and casualty insurance industry. Over this past year, almost every speaker from a property and casualty insurer mentioned the potential impact of self-driving cars on the insurance industry. However, few of them described exactly how the industry will be different, except to state that it will be very different from what it is today. This article will attempt to fill in the gaps by analyzing the implication of self-driving cars on the property and casualty (P&C) insurance industry and specifically, the auto insurance industry.
Before the analysis, we have to first define the self-driving car in discussion. There are a couple possibilities. First, the most primitive form of self-driving car would be one that requires supervision from the driver. For example, currently, Google's self-driving car requires the driver to manually control the car when there is construction ahead. This form of self-driving car will most likely shift the responsibility of the accident back to the driver since they are supposedly overseeing the car’s operations, so it will have a minimal effect on the auto insurance industry. However, once the technology matures, it will be unnecessary to have a driver overseeing the car, and at that point, Google or other companies that have self-driving technology will start to be responsible for the accident caused by their "product," as it will make no sense to impose the liability on the drivers.
When the developers are responsible for the self-driving technology, there will be dramatic shift in the P&C insurance industry. There will no longer be any reason to insure yourself if you know that Google will be completely responsible for all damages, which is the most likely case under the strict liability of current product liability laws. If people stop insuring themselves, then the major players in auto insurance, such as Geico, Progressive, and State Farm, will suffer significantly. One may argue that there will still be a need for insurance, and yes, I agree. However, since the risk is transferred to one single entity such as Google, thousands of insurance policies will most likely be reduced to one master policy covered by a single insurance company, and the profit made from this type of policy cannot be compared to the profitability of the current auto insurance industry. Further, the auto insurance industry makes up over 24 percent of premiums for the P&C insurance industry[1], so if the auto insurance industry decline, it will cause a huge dent in the P&C market. At the same time, the P&C job market will be flooded by agents who lost their jobs due to the declining auto insurance industry.
However, the auto insurance industry will not be completely eliminated. One of the auto insurance industry services that will remain is its extensive claim service network because regardless of who is taking responsibility for the claim, the claimants and the subjects of the accidents still need places to get their money and fill out the legal forms. I predict that these current auto insurance companies may cooperate with companies such as Google, and they will administer the claims in return for a lump sum fee.
One may argue that self-driving car is still far away from widespread use because the system is too expensive. As the Washington Post pointed out, the self-driving car's 3D sensor alone costs $70,000 dollars[2]. However, these sensors, like any other technologies, will most likely follow Moore’s Law and their prices will decrease by half every year, but the performance will increase by twice as much. After only a few years, the cost of the self-driving system will fall to the range that is affordable to the public.
One may also argue that self-driving cars will be delayed significantly due to the current driving laws, but looking back at history, technologies often shape the way we make laws and not the other way around. Also, if there is problem with liability, some firm will surely hire many lawyers to work the problem out.
In the coming decades, the self-driving car will definitely emerge somewhere in the world, even if it does not start from the U.S. Of course, all of my predictions are pure speculation, so please comment below and tell me what you think will happen!


[1] National Association of Insurance Commissioner, Property & Casualty & Title Mid-Year 2013 Industry Report (2013), www.naic.org
[2] Brad Plumer, Here’s what it would take for self-driving cars to catch on (Oct 23, 2013), http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/10/23/heres-what-it-would-take-for-self-driving-cars-to-catch-on/

Friday, January 3, 2014

Is the actuarial job market getting tougher?

As I read through past threads on Actuarial Outpost, the general consensus from 2005 until today is that the job market for Actuaries is getting tougher and more competitive. It is interesting that the people continuously think the job market for actuaries is getting harder for such a long time. One would imagine that the actuarial job market should follow the natural cycles of any other profession. An easy market attracts more new candidates, and once the market is too crowded, people start avoiding the profession. As more people avoid the profession, the market will again return to a more lax state. However this cycle was not observed through the past 8 years with the actuarial job market, and instead people seem to think that the job market for actuaries is constantly getting tougher without any sign of recovery or reversal.
         This phenomenon raised my interest. Are people on Actuarial Outpost simply the ones who like to complain, or is the actuaries’ job market actually getting tougher? If it is getting tougher, how tough is it getting compared to other professional fields? If you are thinking about a career change, this article may offer something to think about. If you are getting ready to graduate with an Actuarial Science degree like I am, then you will be more prepared for the challenges you will face when looking for an actuarial job.

Is the actuarial job market getting tougher?
The actuarial job market is definitely getting tougher as the number of job seekers outnumber the annual vacancies by three to four times. There are approximately 1100 new actuarial positions available every year, 600 is from the organic growth of the industry[1] and 550 from the retirement of older actuaries[2]. In contrast there are 3500-4200 new actuarial job seekers on the market every year***.  For every vacancy there are three to four people fighting over the same position. Unless you deem yourself as the first 25% of candidates, you probably won’t find a job in the actuarial field.
To make it even worse, despite the market's’ inability to digest the candidates, the number of job seekers is increasing by approximately 200 per year. This number may not seem like a lot, but relative to the number of vacancies (1150/yr) it is significant. The continuous increase in candidates passing the actuarial exam is making the job market more crowded than ever. So it seems that complaints on Actuarial Outpost about how tough the job market has been are justified. The market is indeed getting tougher.  For those of you who cannot find jobs, you are not necessarily lazy or unqualified. You are simply unlucky enough to have chosen a tough market: the actuarial job market.

***I estimated this number of job seekers using the number of people passing the SOA probability exam in the USA each year: approximately 3500-4200 people, which is 70% of the total exam passers. I assume that all of these people have intents to find opportunities within the Actuarial field as the exam requires a significant effort to pass, and it is unlikely that one would take the exam without any intention of coming into the Actuarial field.

How tough is the job market for Actuarial Science majors relative to the job markets of the other professions?
I am going to compare the job market of Actuarial Science to the ones of Computer Science, Finance, and Accounting. I chose these fields because these were the majors that I considered when going to college, and these are also the professions mentioned for comparison on Actuarial Outpost. I found contradictory results: while the job market seems to favor the Computer Science major the most, the unemployment rate suggests Actuarial Science to be a better major in terms of career opportunities. However, because of potential biases associated with the unemployment statistics and my observation of my peers, I argue the former job market analysis is more accurate.
To analyze the respective job markets, I first compared the number of available new jobs with the number of qualifying candidates.

Actuarial Science
Computer Science
Finance
Accounting
# of new jobs/yr[3]
   1,081
123,249[4]
36,287[5]
 51,787[6]
# of candidates[7]
4,435[8]
50,463[9]
39,749[10]
58,542[11]
# of graduates per job
  4.10
   0.41
     1.10
    1.13

It is not an illusion that your peers in Finance, Accounting, or Computer Science have an easier time finding jobs. Even though the Finance and Accounting majors are facing a relatively saturated market, with slightly more than one candidate fighting over one position, the Actuarial Science professionals are facing fierce competition with more than four candidates for every one job opening.

[12]
         However, the unemployment rate of each major tells the exact opposite story. Computer Science suddenly becomes the worst major while Actuarial Science is now the best major with legendary unemployment rate of 0%. This is the statistic that has lured many students into the field of actuarial science. To be honest, I am not sure which set of statistics is telling the truth. From my personal experience, I would lean towards the first. However, if the first set is true, how could Actuarial Science major have an unemployment rate of 0%?
         The first possibility is that the statistics are inaccurate because of the small sample size for Actuarial Science majors. When the sample size is small, the derived statistics have higher variation and therefore more extreme results. This is further confirmed by the information published by WSJ: majors with highest and lowest unemployment rate are all occupied by the least popular majors, which have smaller sample sizes.
The second possibility is that Actuarial Science majors are more occupation oriented. They may care more about stability and not being jobless, so they would accept an irrelevant or menial job just to stay away from unemployment.  Computer Science majors may have a more stubborn criteria for their jobs, so they would be willing to stay home while waiting for a better offer.
The third possibility is that Actuarial Science major actually gives a candidate an exponentially higher advantage relative to other candidates who simply pass exams without an Actuarial Science degree, so the Actuarial Science major gets the majority of 1000 new jobs available each year while the rest of the candidates would fight for the remaining spots.
Most likely, it is the combination of these three factors that has resulted in 0% unemployment rate. However, two of the three factors are only biases due to the statistical method and individuals’ attitudes towards jobs. They are not true factors reflecting the current market condition for actuaries.
In conclusion, don’t be lured by the low unemployment rate. It is not as easy as it seems. Actuarial job market is in fact tougher than the other ones. Unless you are confident that you make a top tier actuarial candidate, choose an alternate major that will be more transferable and has better job market prospects.
If you have any questions or suggestions, please don't hesitate to comment below!


[1] According to Bureau of Labor Statistics, the projected job growth over the next ten years is 5,800. After the growth is annualized, there will be 580 new jobs per year.
[2] I assumed the retirement rate of actuaries to be 2.562%. Since there are 21,700 existing actuaries, 556 of them will retire every year. I calculated the 2.562% by using the number of people becoming age 65 every year and the number of existing work force. This is a rough estimate, so if you can find a better statistic, please let me know!
[3] The statistics are calculated using the assumption that the retirement rate is 2.562% with the statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
[4] The statistic includes jobs for computer programmers, computer systems analysts, database administrators, information security analyst, web developer, network computer architect, network and computer systems administrators, and software developers.
[5] This statistic includes jobs for budget analysts, cost estimators, financial analysts, financial examiners, and personal financial advisors.
[6] This statistics includes jobs for accountant, auditors, tax examiners and collectors, and revenue agents.
[7] These statistics are from College Prowler, and they include both Master and Bachelor graduates.
[8] This statistic is the number of people passing exam P in the U.S. every year.
[9] This statistic includes graduates from the following majors: Computer Science, Computer Programming, Computer and IT Administration, Computer Systems, Data Processing, and Information Studies
[10] This statistic includes graduates from the following majors: Finance, Banking and Finance, and Investments and Securities
[11] This statistic includes graduates from the following majors: Accounting, Accounting Technician and Bookkeeping, and Taxation
[12] http://graphicsweb.wsj.com/documents/NILF1111/#term=